I agree on this point. While there are some issues with the substitutions, I feel like I understand why he is making the decision at the time. The glaring issue remains Sinclaire, but we have know that will be an issue for a few years now (Parsons, Wilkinson and now Norris). Otherwise I have to trust levels of fitness and recognition tha…
I agree on this point. While there are some issues with the substitutions, I feel like I understand why he is making the decision at the time. The glaring issue remains Sinclaire, but we have know that will be an issue for a few years now (Parsons, Wilkinson and now Norris). Otherwise I have to trust levels of fitness and recognition that a player is at the end of their game.
I think Norris has to find a way to light a fire under the team, and do it consistently. The difficulty of that is this team is so experienced that those efforts are really difficult. This will be a good indicator if Norris can do it, because there are a number of points he can bring up to challenge the team. Sloppy game they should have won, poor refereeing, even the choice to pass on VAR can be used to motivate the team to play better.
I agree on this point. While there are some issues with the substitutions, I feel like I understand why he is making the decision at the time. The glaring issue remains Sinclaire, but we have know that will be an issue for a few years now (Parsons, Wilkinson and now Norris). Otherwise I have to trust levels of fitness and recognition that a player is at the end of their game.
I think Norris has to find a way to light a fire under the team, and do it consistently. The difficulty of that is this team is so experienced that those efforts are really difficult. This will be a good indicator if Norris can do it, because there are a number of points he can bring up to challenge the team. Sloppy game they should have won, poor refereeing, even the choice to pass on VAR can be used to motivate the team to play better.