Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Timber Bob's avatar

The biggest change I've seen since the coaching change is the team controls a game more often now which allows them to attack more freely. Under Gio the last couple seasons, the team didn't control much of the games so it was difficult to win. Now it often feels more like the Timbers have a good chance of winning. Just controlling enough of the game like they did for most of the second half at L.A. gets them a good chance of winning, which they almost got the fourth goal. Many of the players look much more sure of themselves and more dangerous now. They are putting together some good combinations of passing to get good shots where before that was so rare. They still need more practice on set piece defending.

Benno's avatar

This game was interesting, as it showed both the improvements by the team under Joseph and the defensive problems the team has had all year long. It is far too much to expect the team to be completely changed under Joseph, but the speed at which teams are punishing the Timbers is a concern. But again, playing without Evander and (effectively) Paredes shows that the team remains dangerous going forward. What will be interesting is how the team will look when Chara, Evander, Paredes and Moreno are available. I feel like they all need to be on the field, but how will that work? Does Moreno go back to the wing? Right now its a good problem to have as the midfield depth has suffered so much from injuries. I'm actually not that concerned going forward as having 4 players for 3 positions is a good problem to have, especially with Moreno having positional flexibility. Going forward will require some decisions, with Acosta playing well and Williamson/Ayala coming back from injury.

All in all I'm okay with a point on the road, even if I think they should have gotten all 3.

21 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?